eFactoryPro 3.0
143 results found
-
Closed/Incomplete
Closed but Incomplete option for PMs- Need an option to close out work orders (specifically PMs) that are incomplete.
11 votes -
Agilizar el filtrado de ordenes a revisar (Supevisores)
Visibilidad en pantalla principal de revisión de ordenes de que técnico cerró la tarea.
Nos agilizará a los supervisores el filtrado de las ordenes que requerimos revisar.
4 votes -
Letters/words still too light
Please make the words on the screen darker and easier to see. For sites using older screens, the text is still too light to see clearly causing eye strain.
2 votes -
Can We get Asset field listed on Review portal?
When Reviewing Work Orders it would be much faster if the Asset was listed so you don't have to open the record if there's any question upon review.
1 vote -
COLOCAR FOTOGRAFIA PARA LAS MAQUINAS EN EL PORTAL
Una idea que podría llegar a ser muy útil para nuevos usuarios o cuando se cambia alguien de planta. Es que se le pueda colocar una FOTOGRAFIA de la maquina en del equipo en esta plataforma y de esa manera seria muchísimo más fácil de encontrarlas cuando te asignan una tarea en ella.
1 vote -
Limit technician active sites
Allow the technician to remain active on one site at a time. If the technician migrates from the site, automatically mark his team status at the previous site as inactive.
10 votes -
Multiple Bins
If the part is in multiple bins allow the option to select which bin you want to pull the part from. Right now it defaults based on BIN name alphabetically. This can cause confusion and inventory discrepancies.
4 votes -
Mass processing of reviewed completed tasks.
Mass check off of reviewed task when completed. Supervisor and review completed task and check a box. Once all tasks have been reviewed, the supervisor can click on the mass close out for all the reviewed completed task to process. instead of doing having the system process each one individually. This would save a lot of time waiting.
1 vote -
Equipment in Work module needs an additional field to identify "At Risk" equipment.
Adding a field for "At Risk" Equipment allows filtering out these assets to support Design for Reliability Process on the Reliability Maturity Pyramid process. This should have functionality to be mass updated with the Master Equipment list load and able to be modified easily by the site Planner/Scheduler Role.
5 votes -
Follow Up Task - Asset ID
Remove the need to add an Asset ID when creating a Follow Up Task
1 vote -
Labor Hour Tab Quits Working After 15 days
The labor tab every month only displays out to the 15th. Then I have to select the 16th thru the rest of the month or each day. I use this feature to keep track of my tech utilization hours. Thank you, Michael
1 vote -
Subscribing to updates of specific work orders
It would be nice to be able to stay subscribed to a work order's updates in regard to parts orders even after it has changed ownership from technician to planner and so on. This would allow technicians to be informed once parts were kitted in the crib that we have been waiting on.
1 vote -
Change MRCT WO/Task Type to PR
supervisor having ability to change an MRCT WO/Task to a project. A lot of times the requestor selects the wrong type of work order and it take time to cancel and create new WOs when tis happens after the fact
5 votes -
Edits during task review
Have the ability to edit WO type that customers put in. Have ability to change task type from other to reactive. Have ability to add/edit asset from subtype to actual asset.
2 votes -
Test3
Brenda Testing
1 vote -
TEst 2
Brenda TEst 2
1 vote -
Operator Performed Maintenance sub-type should be available for MCRT type work orders.
Customer has requested all down work orders use sub-types to track responsibility for assets being down. The "Operator Performed Maintenance" sub type cannot be added to a MCRT work order. We need this sub-type to be available to MCRT work orders. Can have changed so it is available on MCRT?
5 votesAfter further review with the site, it seems there is a little confusion on this request.
"Operator error" the Operator causes the problem. "Operator performed maintenance" the Operator fixes the problem. The site is trying to use the sub-types to distinguish between who is responsible for resolving an issue and any extended downtime that occurred.
An example of "operator performed maintenance" 3rd shift operator has a non-maintenance machine issue related to training or experience that prevents running the machine. So, the machine sits idle with a down work order submitted. 1st shift operator arrives and being more experienced is able to fix the issue and begins running the machine.
This functionality will also be useful as our Operator-Performed Maintenance (OPM) program continues to grow within ATS. I am reopening the request to discuss further with our teams.
-
Searching Parts in Tech Portal
Adding the Site Reference field as a searchable option. Some sites use this for customer part numbers.
2 votes -
Print WO/TASK with Parts Used and Part Needs
When a tech, planner, or SCS prints a WO/Task it should have the parts used and the part needs listed. This will help when kitting or staging parts that are just received in or ready to be installed.
2 votes -
Part need issues, Location issues with Fastest lead time and custom
When adding a part to a task the two options for Fastest Lead Time and Custom create more issue than it actually helps. It defaults to Location ATS when most sites are location Customer. It should not allow them to select ATS or Customer based on the contract type. IT will also create bad stock records under the wrong location. Finally, it will generate a REQ to order under that wrong location which the SCS or Buyer may not catch. This cause billing and inventory issues.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?
