Curtis, Patience
My feedback
21 results found
-
6 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
The current configuration was originally designed to ensure asset records don't remain empty, given that manual maintenance across every asset isn't scalable with our current resources, while also preserving cross-site visibility of parts history. Because this touches core operational workflows and historical site practices, any decision to alter this setup or to establish a formal auditing process requires review and alignment with leadership. We will continue to evaluate.
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Curtis, Patience
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
We're currently working on a new supply chain portal that includes the cycle counts functionality. We'll keep this feedback in mind as we continue designing that experience. While we can't make any commitments about specific changes at this time, improving usability and layout are considerations we're taking into account as the new portal is developed.
Curtis, Patience
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Curtis, Patience
supported this idea
·


