Skip to content

eFactoryPro 3.0

eFactoryPro 3.0

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

32 results found

  1. Remove Delete buttons for SCS on Run Log

    SCS delete Run IDs from the Run Log thinking it will delete the actual Stock Count Run but it only deletes the historical data reported on the Run Log. The DELETE buttons should be removed from the Client on the Run Log.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. SCS need ability to add parts to BoM

    Currently only SM & PS have access to manually add Part IDs to BoM. The SCS also needs this ability.

    24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Stock Count should not allow new Stock to be created by user if a previous Stock Count is still open.

    We could avoid Stock Count Exceptions if eFP did not allow users to create a new Stock Count Run if a previous Stock Count Run ID is still open.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Stock Count creation should require Place ID be entered.

    The Stock Counts should require Place ID to be entered in filed provided. eFP currently shows Place ID field is Required field but the system does not actually require it. Sites often mistakenly run Stock Counts wide-open for All materials sites.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. SCS should not have the ability to perform a manual cost change for parts in the eFP Client

    SCS should not have the ability to perform a manual cost change for parts in the eFP Client.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Need ability to run Escalations Report for specific site instead of wide open for all sites

    Need ability to run Escalations Report i Client and SSRS web page for specific site instead of wide open for all sites - currently there is not an option avl. to select one site

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Enable Add Assembly

    Give sites the ability to "Add Assemblies" for parts in inventory. It would be very helpful to add an assembly list of parts that are used to create another part (e.g. a pump could have bearings, gaskets, and an impeller as assembly parts)

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Provide ability to return parts to suppliers on PO they were bought on

    Please provide the ability to return parts to suppliers on the same PO they were bought on even if ATS has already paid the supplier's invoice. We should be able to enter an RMA # from supplier and properly process any restocking fees by passing those fees on to our customer or choosing to absorb those fees internally if the return is not the fault of our customer. This process should also show as a credit to our customers on the monthly Billable PO report used for invoicing our customers.

    23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. MACHINE DETAILS ON WORKORDER IN THE CLIENT.

    When looking up a work order in the Client it no longer (very rarely) shows you the work order details for machine. The is crucial to us (sc & s/p) to have this.

    **I have placed in tickets and no matter what it has always come back as "resolved" even if it the problem has not been corrected.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Add PO Events for changes to Due Dates on PO lines.

    Need an Event to show Date/Time and CreatedBy for any changes to PO line Due Date.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Client: Purchase Order Details

    knowing who put the part need request into the system lets us know who to go to for clarification. we need to be able to go to one person and ask what they mean/ or what they want.

    the general request does not always cover what needs to be done. this is very important and can take a LOT OF TIME getting the proper information.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Lock out matrix and tools need to perform task based maintenance should be included in RJP to increase efficiency and safety.

    Task based lock out matrix can be added to the RJP template as well as any tools or PPE required to perform the job correctly and safely.

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base