eFactoryPro 3.0
127 results found
-
When a workorder is scheduled for more than one person it shouldn't be able to be closed out until everyone has closed their section.
When a workorder is scheduled for more than one person it shouldn't be able to be closed out until everyone has closed their section. The way it is now once someone closes it the others who haven't put their time in do does not get their time accounted for.
3 votes -
parts location
we need parts location on parts used
3 votes -
Filter Fix
WO/Task filter need to be reworked. Sometimes it works but most times when you type in a specific workorder or task number it just comes up with a full list of either one.
2 votes -
Correcting Parts Used within the WEM Review Process
Having the capability to correct Parts Used during the reviewing WEM process.
1 vote -
Make Criticality emergency-1 the default when customer is creating reactive W/O
When customer is creating a work order they hardly pick the level 1-emergency schedule breaker, if default was level 1 we would have less of a chance of it getting overlooked in the daily schedule.
1 vote -
Asset ID Update
The system utilizes both a equipment number (which I'm assuming is a primary key for the equipment file) and the asset ID. If that is the case, why can't the Asset ID be updated during work order review without a major overhaul to the work order by deleting information off the task first?
1 vote -
Search options
Bring back the search options from the last versions.
1 vote -
Vista previa de imagenes
Tener vista previa de las fotos subidas, sin tener que descargarlas.
2 votes -
When Parts Arrive For Work Orders
When Parts Arrive For Work Orders Let The Assigned Tech Know With An Automated Email
1 vote -
Customer Sign-in
Portal login screen asks for email address where the customer logs in; it should ask for site number or user name.
2 votes -
Include Teams as option in control center.
Description :
eFactory Pro 3.0 Portal - Control Center, Can we either have "team" or an option for "external team" added to the conditions to set up a new rule.1 vote -
BOM Expansion
On the parts tab have a tab/dropdown for listing all parts on the BOM
4 votes -
"Change Over" added to the Customer and Tech Portal screens
"Change Over" column added to the Customer and Tech Portal screens with a "Y/N"
Customer and Operations could filter for Change Over jobs quicker than pulling a report everyday and filtering to find new change over jobs that have been entered.
10 votes -
Put high priority icon (fire) on tiles in the My Schedule view.
Put the same high priority icon (fire) that appears in the planner portal on the tiles in the technician My Schedule views.
1 vote -
attachment for requisition
The ability to attach information to requisition
1 vote -
EFP 3.0 inventory levels
In the old system, us technicians on the floor could visually see the min/max levels of parts we were consuming. This allowed us to know if the part was going to be reordered or not. In the technicians portal of EFP3.0, we are unaware if the part we have consumed will be reordered or not. This is valuable to know if we will need that part again and not be in stock.
8 votes -
Add "Requestor" as a column in Tasks tab in the Technician portal
Add "Requestor" column in the TASKS tab in the Technician portal that is similar in the WORK ORDERS tab. This will be very useful for management to identify the Technician that creates a FM (Follow-Up Maintenance) task on MPRO Work Orders. The current process requires the user to click on each individual FM task and scrolling the summary page to find the technicians name under "CREATED".
7 votes -
Add a "Missed" button to WO Type: MPRO > Task Type: PM
There needs to be an additional button labeled as "Missed" in the Work Order or Task Pane for "PM" Task Types only. This button should function similar to the Red X for "Cancel Work Order" or "Cancel Task", except when you select this option, it should trigger a window to pop up requesting a reason for variance. i.e. Equipment Unavailable, Personnel Needed etc. and it should also require the user to type a comment/note.
Example for why this option needs to be available:
Asset XYZ-123 has a PM generated on a monthly interval.
The monthly PM was completed in Jan,…9 votes -
Inverse filtering.
In addition to having filters such as "starts with," "equals," and "contains." Can we have the inverse, such as "does not start with," "does not equal," and "does not contain."
5 votes -
To add a field for indicate if a Pm was audited
One opportunity that we see in e-Factory is that the system doesn´t have a field for to indicate if the PM was audited. We are suggesting a field as a check mark and with this, to get the option in a report for to verify quickly how many pm´s were audited. The field may be add to Shift turn over report.
24 votesunder review ·
AdminOldfield, Michelle
(Business Analyst, Advanced Technology Services, Inc.)
responded
This feedback is being examined by Operations leadership for possible inclusion in a future development sprint.
- Don't see your idea?
