Skip to content

eFactoryPro 3.0

eFactoryPro 3.0

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

287 results found

  1. Expand report capability

    On the portal: expand the technician and the supervisor categories to date closed and notes from technicians.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  2. Source name on work order not just customer

    Add source name to work order so techs can communicate directly with source about issue when need arise.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  3. Shift Report-Add Work Order Status Field

    Add work order status to the shift turnover report. This will be used to audit sites work order statuses versus task statuses. Problem is sites have open work orders with closed tasks, and need to manage this discrepancy.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  4. Add Object Under Repair Code

    Please add the option for "Filler" in object drop down menu in the repair tab.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  5. Job type

    Hello, We have a opportunitty here in Nuevo Laredo with the Efactory pro 3.0 normally we give support to operations when they have the machine down by a setup or fixture repairs.

    The problem here this type of order is very frequently they are introducing like MRCT because for them the machine really is down but by something that is out of our scoope.

    Once the work order are in the system there are not a option to change to"others", this cause us a rework because to correct this is neccessary cancel and make new order with the correct type.

    31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  1 comment  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  6. Add "requestor" as a column in task tabs in portal

    Add a new column in the task tab which indicates who created the task
    similar to how the work order tab does.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →

    Briand, thank you for your feedback! Work orders are directly requested by customers, as they represent the work request that needs to be resolved. Tasks represent the record where all the technician’s labor, remarks, and part usages are stored. They are not requested by the customer, but are attached to a work order to provide data on the repair. For this reason, the task grid does not show a requestor, since tasks are not requested.

  7. Receiving parts that already have a bin location for a work order should not default to WORKORDER bin when it is received.

    When a tech requests a part that already has a bin location in the system, say 100179699 which is located in shelf D01G and have non on hand, a req will generate under the work order category specifically for that work order. However, once we receive that part in the system, it will automatically default to the "WORKORDER" bin instead of its original bin which was D01G. Can we change this in the system? We never had this issue in SAP, so if the part was canceled from the work order, it would stay in the original bin. This will…

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  8. CMs, malfunctions and breakdowns.

    When a malfunction is entered with its' start date after the WO creation date, the system changes the breakdown flag as "NO".

    Sometimes the customer will report an issue and continue working the machine until we arrive to fix the equipment. Even though they didn't stop right away, We are still taking the machine down within the production schedule because of a problem reported by the customer. This should be considered as a malfunction (Breakdown - Yes) and count against MTTR, MTBF as any other failure.

    What I am saying is that a malfuntion start date after the creation date…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  9. Inventory control needed

    I've contacted Oracle on RTD solutions via a cloud based platform. We are experiencing some issues on management of equipment in house and could use something like this to track parts/equipment and monitor revenue and expense as we look to provide new services to our client. If anyone has suggestions please let me know. I'm in hope that an account with Oracle Nsuites could be beneficial and a solution reapplied across ATS.
    Michael Aufdenberg

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  10. Colocar pistolas de soluble

    Colocar pistolas de soluble a cada máquina para que el operador al final de turno lave su máquina internamente de toda la rebaba acumulada durante turno.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  11. Increase Schedule Board 'Display Field' Maximum

    Add a 3rd field to 'Display Field' in the Schedule Board. At present there is a limit on the number of fields you can select in the 'Display Field'. The Schedule Board is a fantastic tool with huge potential. However it is unusable in it's current state. I need a minimum of 3 fields to choose from. I need to have the
    1. Task Number
    2. Description of the Task
    3. Asset Number
    Without these 3 fields the Schedule will not make sense

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  12. Tech Portal: Add "Do not substitute" option to 'part need' screen

    We have had several issues with parts being substituted for incorrect parts needed.
    I feel it would benefit all sites if a "do not substitute" box was added the section of the portal when a technician enters a part need.

    Part need request
    Supply chain

    22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  13. Erase reason for variance

    Erase reason for variance

    When accidentally we put a reason for variance in portal, we cant edit to put the fill blank, we need to go to the CLIENT and edit from there.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  14. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  15. Scheduling Board automatically checking Planning Complete

    Schedule Board and Planning Complete Check Box

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    declined  ·  0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  16. new work order assignment

    when I make a work order/task it should automatically be assigned to me and go to my list

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  17. Need Better Event Logging of Who Changes Tasks

    Better event logging is needed. Need to know who changes downtime, who completed a work order, and who modified times inputted into work order.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  18. PM Task Duration Report

    Need to be able to pull the open PM tasks with a the task duration already included. Right now it's a manual process and increases non-value added work to our day.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  19. Enable us to minimize the split screen to view the tasks in full screen.

    On the tasks display the split screen is used. It should be able to be minimized when not needed, this will give more screen space when looking through tasks.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
  20. Shorten steps for creating MPRO

    Creating a proactive work order in the portal actually creates an MRCT. The only way to make a proper MPRO is to do it in the client

    Creating a proactive work order in the client takes a lot of steps, and a lot of time.

    I'm hoping this thought can go towards the planned Planner/Scheduler part of the portal, but we really need a way to shorten these steps. If we have to create 5+ work orders with so many steps, it takes a very long time in the client. And there isn't a way to PROPERLY do it in…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base