Skip to content

eFactoryPro 3.0

eFactoryPro 3.0

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

274 results found

  1. Mandatory Place ID entry when creating Stock Count for Cycle counts

    Make this a mandatory input field so stock counts/cycle counts are not ran wide open for the whole company/all sites.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Print label automatically during receiving process

    A label should generate to print like a RCV document does to print the part label during the receiving process. Navigating to a report and manually generating is a long process that is not efficient.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Client  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Require Standard Part Nomenclature to Part Description

    Parts need a standard description to search parts effectively (ex: All 1-7/16" 4-bolt Flange Block Bearings should be listed as: "1-7/16IN ID; 4B; FB" or all 480V 15HP 3500RPM 215 C-face motors should be listed as "15HP; 3500RPM; 215TC; 480V"). This will greatly increase the buyer and supply chain specialist's abilities to source parts from other local sites, vendors, or manufacturers.
    If possible, this could be done as "required fields" when entering new parts into the system that auto-generate a part description from the fields.

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Operator Performed Maintenance sub-type should be available for MCRT type work orders.

    Customer has requested all down work orders use sub-types to track responsibility for assets being down. The "Operator Performed Maintenance" sub type cannot be added to a MCRT work order. We need this sub-type to be available to MCRT work orders. Can have changed so it is available on MCRT?

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    After further review with the site, it seems there is a little confusion on this request.


    "Operator error" the Operator causes the problem. "Operator performed maintenance" the Operator fixes the problem. The site is trying to use the sub-types to distinguish between who is responsible for resolving an issue and any extended downtime that occurred.


    An example of "operator performed maintenance" 3rd shift operator has a non-maintenance machine issue related to training or experience that prevents running the machine. So, the machine sits idle with a down work order submitted. 1st shift operator arrives and being more experienced is able to fix the issue and begins running the machine.


    This functionality will also be useful as our Operator-Performed Maintenance (OPM) program continues to grow within ATS. I am reopening the request to discuss further with our teams.

  5. test-tru

    test-tru

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Training  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Metric for PM feedback

    Metric for PM feedback

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. daily capacity

    could we make it possible so that when on the daily capacity if you click on a job in someone's daily schedule it gives you the job updates ( notes etc )

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Print WO/TASK with Parts Used and Part Needs

    When a tech, planner, or SCS prints a WO/Task it should have the parts used and the part needs listed. This will help when kitting or staging parts that are just received in or ready to be installed.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Part need issues, Location issues with Fastest lead time and custom

    When adding a part to a task the two options for Fastest Lead Time and Custom create more issue than it actually helps. It defaults to Location ATS when most sites are location Customer. It should not allow them to select ATS or Customer based on the contract type. IT will also create bad stock records under the wrong location. Finally, it will generate a REQ to order under that wrong location which the SCS or Buyer may not catch. This cause billing and inventory issues.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Saving table and team filter

    Is there a way to save your table filters or team filter

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Work module part search is not looking for manufacturer part number which is what we typically use.

    When we search for a part using the manufacturer number it comes back with no results. Also if we use a dash it will come back with all the site parts.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Part Notes/Description section

    It would be great if parts has a better notes/description text section so that additional info buyers need to get the actual specifics correct could be entered or misc info that is helpful to everyone

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Feedback status notification to the initiator

    Feedback status notification to the initiator. Currently when an employee or customer provides feedback to the planner; no status results are sent to the initiator. So they have no clue if their feedback was rejected or approved. Especially rejected, should come with an explanation or comment.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Planner Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Create a condition in Event Monitor for 'Task Status'

    We can currently create a condition to notify when a WO status changes, but not a task status change. This could notify that a new part need was created (status on the task changes from 'new' to 'hold/waiting on materials'). This could alert the SCS or crib attendant to begin kitting for that WO, so the parts are already ready when the tech comes to get the parts.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Authority to cancel parts used/consumed.

    Option to cancel parts consumed/ used. Operators have entered in wrong part number or quantity and consumed it by mistake.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Dedicated Crib PC/Login

    Is it possible to create a log in that can be used on a dedicated PC located in the Crib/Store that can display the Crib Portal? This will only be used to identify the location of stock.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Period Capacity Export Planned Hours Format

    Reformat the Period Capacity export planned duration hours column to be in a Decimal Point Number format instead of the current format of 0 HRS 38 MIN. The current format has to be converted every time someone exports it to Excel then they have to manually do the conversions.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. MERGE W/O TOGETHER

    I WORKED AT A PLACE WHERE IF YOU HAD DUPLICATE W/O "S FOR THE SAME ISSUE. WE THEN COULD MERGE BOTH W/O'S TOGETHER. IT WAS A MERGE BUTTON ON THE SCREEN THAT WE COULD HIT AFTER SELECTING 2 W/O'S WITH A CHECK MARK NEXT TO THEM. THEN IT ASKED US WHICH WORK ORDER TO KEEP AND WHICH ONE TO MERGE TO THE KEPT ONE. MADE THINGS EASIER. ATLEAST GIVE THIS TO THE PLANNER/SCHEDULER
    THANKS

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Assignations

    Assignations always displayed on "My Work", not for date and add filter by date.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Determine type of job by work order on the review tab

    If we can add type of job performed by work order as for example: Electric, Mechanic, Hydraulic, Pneumatic, Electronic, Lubrication, Coolant. We can determine Downtime & MTTR due to each of these, by plant, area, or technician. With this we can understand development needs by plant, area or technician, so we can set the trainings needed for our people and also track its effectiveness on each specific case

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Training  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Great suggestion! There is projects currently in place to tackle this exact issue. We are redefining the skills and skillsets for technicians, equipment, and for job requirements. These 3 will work together to specify development requirements for technicians and provide us with skillset requirements based on equipment requirements.

  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base