eFactoryPro 3.0
270 results found
-
Agilizar el filtrado de ordenes a revisar (Supevisores)
Visibilidad en pantalla principal de revisión de ordenes de que técnico cerró la tarea.
Nos agilizará a los supervisores el filtrado de las ordenes que requerimos revisar.
5 votes -
Photos for parts
I think it would be a huge asset if we could add photos of parts to the database that appear where the "robot arm" is located in the parts screen. Would be good to be allowed multiple photos with arrows to cycle through them. I realize this could open an avenue for error but if a process for validation is created the benefits would be great I think.
15 votes -
Status monitor with UP CM tickets.
Need a way to monitor up tickets that are CM tickets on the status monitor. All to often we customer puts in tickets as down or reduced so they can keep track of them and they do not affect production of a machine. This is not down and should not affect machine availability. However, do not want to show all up tickets on the status monitor as it will show all PMs as up tickets. Somehow we need a way to display CM tickets that are up so they do not get forgotten about.
1 vote -
Staged parts removed from available count.
Staged parts should be removed from inventory availability count. This will trigger the system to initiate a restock based on demand. Also, this will allow for inventory to be staged in reusable job plans that regenerate.
3 votes -
DT required button added to job plan
Add a field in the Job plan template to indicate if this task requires DT
14 votesUnder review with IT team.
-
Replace the planned start date with the first date of the period capacity or Scheduling Period dates on the all open tasks screen.
Replace the planned start date with the first date of the period capacity or Scheduling Period dates on the all open tasks screen.
3 votes -
Letters/words still too light
Please make the words on the screen darker and easier to see. For sites using older screens, the text is still too light to see clearly causing eye strain.
1 vote -
Job Remarks Section
The original EfP had a job remarks section that would allow you to view all remarks under an asset without needing to open each individual work order. That feature was widely used and very helpful in looking for previous issue, repairs, and machine health trends. This would be useful in the current iteration as well.
2 votes -
PM -> AM button changes labor time field.
When adding labor to a task after 12PM, if you select the start time and enter the hour then minute then click the PM -> AM button, it appears to work but will enter a different time when you press 'Set'. The PM -> AM button must be pressed first to work correctly. Would be nice if it worked in any order.
2 votes -
Limit technician active sites
Allow the technician to remain active on one site at a time. If the technician migrates from the site, automatically mark his team status at the previous site as inactive.
10 votes -
Multiple Bins
If the part is in multiple bins allow the option to select which bin you want to pull the part from. Right now it defaults based on BIN name alphabetically. This can cause confusion and inventory discrepancies.
4 votes -
Equipment in Work module needs an additional field to identify "At Risk" equipment.
Adding a field for "At Risk" Equipment allows filtering out these assets to support Design for Reliability Process on the Reliability Maturity Pyramid process. This should have functionality to be mass updated with the Master Equipment list load and able to be modified easily by the site Planner/Scheduler Role.
5 votes -
Task Planned Proccess Easier and Quicker
Would be helpful to have a quick access to the planner portal into the task to plan the task you are working on it, then once planned back to the task, and dont have to copy the task number, load the planner portal and search the task you want to plan. This would be easier and quiker our work.
28 votes -
Labor Hour Tab Quits Working After 15 days
The labor tab every month only displays out to the 15th. Then I have to select the 16th thru the rest of the month or each day. I use this feature to keep track of my tech utilization hours. Thank you, Michael
1 vote -
test-tru
test
2 votes -
Parts requsition vs consumption quantity
Parts (especially liquids) which are allocated/used in quantities different than their containers hold are troublesome. It would be efficient to be able to receive quantities separate from how allocated and used. so 5 gallon pails(or any volume) could be requisitioned and the allocation and use could be done in a different qty/volume count.
5 votes -
Mandatory Place ID entry when creating Stock Count for Cycle counts
Make this a mandatory input field so stock counts/cycle counts are not ran wide open for the whole company/all sites.
3 votes -
Print label automatically during receiving process
A label should generate to print like a RCV document does to print the part label during the receiving process. Navigating to a report and manually generating is a long process that is not efficient.
3 votes -
Require Standard Part Nomenclature to Part Description
Parts need a standard description to search parts effectively (ex: All 1-7/16" 4-bolt Flange Block Bearings should be listed as: "1-7/16IN ID; 4B; FB" or all 480V 15HP 3500RPM 215 C-face motors should be listed as "15HP; 3500RPM; 215TC; 480V"). This will greatly increase the buyer and supply chain specialist's abilities to source parts from other local sites, vendors, or manufacturers.
If possible, this could be done as "required fields" when entering new parts into the system that auto-generate a part description from the fields.19 votes -
Operator Performed Maintenance sub-type should be available for MCRT type work orders.
Customer has requested all down work orders use sub-types to track responsibility for assets being down. The "Operator Performed Maintenance" sub type cannot be added to a MCRT work order. We need this sub-type to be available to MCRT work orders. Can have changed so it is available on MCRT?
5 votesAfter further review with the site, it seems there is a little confusion on this request.
"Operator error" the Operator causes the problem. "Operator performed maintenance" the Operator fixes the problem. The site is trying to use the sub-types to distinguish between who is responsible for resolving an issue and any extended downtime that occurred.
An example of "operator performed maintenance" 3rd shift operator has a non-maintenance machine issue related to training or experience that prevents running the machine. So, the machine sits idle with a down work order submitted. 1st shift operator arrives and being more experienced is able to fix the issue and begins running the machine.
This functionality will also be useful as our Operator-Performed Maintenance (OPM) program continues to grow within ATS. I am reopening the request to discuss further with our teams.
- Don't see your idea?
