eFactoryPro 3.0
298 results found
-
attachment for requisition
The ability to attach information to requisition
1 vote -
Sort field for Asset ID on daily capacity
Add Assets ID for sort field on daily capacity
7 votes -
Daily capacity
40-hour jobs should fill week out when assigned – Once assigned to one tech the week is filled vs having to create 5 tech slots to fill week
7 votes -
Free text space
Free text note filled in period capacity, i.e. offsite – able to add notes as needed from week to week
3 votes -
Period Capacity Select all feature
Select all on period capacity – able to select all will be able to move all over to execution faster
11 votes -
Color Change for rescheduled tasks
Different color (Orange) for items being rescheduled – When assigning tasks from previous week into daily capacity a visual identifier would help
6 votes -
Technicians wish to see compliance window in My Schedule
Technicians have requested the ability to see the compliance window on the My Schedule view in the new system. This will allow for corrections in case the supervisor or planner schedule the PM incorrectly.
13 votes -
BOM Expansion
On the parts tab have a tab/dropdown for listing all parts on the BOM
4 votes -
eFP web version on iPad
eFP web version on iPad does not show all of the tabs across the top of the task, in order to close it.
The “Event” tab is cut in half, the green check mark and red cancel buttons are completely missing.
I understand that there is an actual eFP iOS app, but it is not written in Spanish. The web version can be translated to Spanish through the preferred language setting of the iPad.
The web version works like normal on the iPad, with exception to the problem mentioned above.
4 votes -
PO GNS Receipt Improvement
When booking in GNS parts is it possible to remove the "Total Cost" field? The reason being is that it does not make any difference to the total, no matter what value i put in this box. Therefore we are all wasting our time every time we book in a GNS part when we fill in this field.
9 votes -
"Change Over" added to the Customer and Tech Portal screens
"Change Over" column added to the Customer and Tech Portal screens with a "Y/N"
Customer and Operations could filter for Change Over jobs quicker than pulling a report everyday and filtering to find new change over jobs that have been entered.
10 votes -
STR based on Task Touched Date Rather than Created Date
It would be nice to have a report just like the Shift Turnover Report, but instead of running based on task/work order created date, it would go off of when the task was last modified. For instance, if I ran the STR for just today, it would only show tasks that were created today. This would miss any work done on a task that was created in the past (like a PM that would have been created a month ago, or a backlog work order that is 6+ months old)
3 votes -
Acknowledgment that No Parts are needed for a work order
It was brought to my attention by one of my technicians that there should be a check box acknowledgement that no parts are needed for a work order reminding them not to forget to sign out parts. He stated that several times, techs forget to add parts to the work order and with the new update, they can't add parts after the work order is closed.
4 votes -
EFP 3.0 inventory levels
In the old system, us technicians on the floor could visually see the min/max levels of parts we were consuming. This allowed us to know if the part was going to be reordered or not. In the technicians portal of EFP3.0, we are unaware if the part we have consumed will be reordered or not. This is valuable to know if we will need that part again and not be in stock.
8 votes -
Add "Requestor" as a column in Tasks tab in the Technician portal
Add "Requestor" column in the TASKS tab in the Technician portal that is similar in the WORK ORDERS tab. This will be very useful for management to identify the Technician that creates a FM (Follow-Up Maintenance) task on MPRO Work Orders. The current process requires the user to click on each individual FM task and scrolling the summary page to find the technicians name under "CREATED".
7 votes -
customer closed work order alert
The customer would like to see the original Work Order description when they get the alert that a work order is closed. sometimes the tech comments are not descriptive enough for them to remember what the work order was particularly when they have a lot of work orders they put in the system.
3 votes -
MIN/MAX
I would be helpful to have access to the parts that still have a min/max that hasn't been set. If Supply Chain could get our hands on a list of parts that don't have a min/max set we could get ahead on submitting SARS instead of waiting for Stock Count or Work Orders to come in. When we enter Stock Counts at the end of the month when we are already busy, if we could enter SARS for items that don't have a min/max when we have down time, we could chip through them then.
5 votes -
Inverse filtering.
In addition to having filters such as "starts with," "equals," and "contains." Can we have the inverse, such as "does not start with," "does not equal," and "does not contain."
5 votes -
Add a "Missed" button to WO Type: MPRO > Task Type: PM
There needs to be an additional button labeled as "Missed" in the Work Order or Task Pane for "PM" Task Types only. This button should function similar to the Red X for "Cancel Work Order" or "Cancel Task", except when you select this option, it should trigger a window to pop up requesting a reason for variance. i.e. Equipment Unavailable, Personnel Needed etc. and it should also require the user to type a comment/note.
Example for why this option needs to be available:
Asset XYZ-123 has a PM generated on a monthly interval.
The monthly PM was completed in Jan,…9 votes -
Technician Name Populated on Goods Receiving Document
Technician Name and Task or Work Order Number needs to be displayed on the goods receiving document in the Client. Currently i have to come out of the Client and into the Technician Portal and find the Task to find out which Technician ordered the part.
29 votes
- Don't see your idea?
