eFactoryPro 3.0
311 results found
-
Parts requsition vs consumption quantity
Parts (especially liquids) which are allocated/used in quantities different than their containers hold are troublesome. It would be efficient to be able to receive quantities separate from how allocated and used. so 5 gallon pails(or any volume) could be requisitioned and the allocation and use could be done in a different qty/volume count.
5 votes -
Work module part search is not looking for manufacturer part number which is what we typically use.
When we search for a part using the manufacturer number it comes back with no results. Also if we use a dash it will come back with all the site parts.
5 votes -
Operator Performed Maintenance sub-type should be available for MCRT type work orders.
Customer has requested all down work orders use sub-types to track responsibility for assets being down. The "Operator Performed Maintenance" sub type cannot be added to a MCRT work order. We need this sub-type to be available to MCRT work orders. Can have changed so it is available on MCRT?
5 votesAfter further review with the site, it seems there is a little confusion on this request.
"Operator error" the Operator causes the problem. "Operator performed maintenance" the Operator fixes the problem. The site is trying to use the sub-types to distinguish between who is responsible for resolving an issue and any extended downtime that occurred.
An example of "operator performed maintenance" 3rd shift operator has a non-maintenance machine issue related to training or experience that prevents running the machine. So, the machine sits idle with a down work order submitted. 1st shift operator arrives and being more experienced is able to fix the issue and begins running the machine.
This functionality will also be useful as our Operator-Performed Maintenance (OPM) program continues to grow within ATS. I am reopening the request to discuss further with our teams.
-
Part number search should disregard dashes, slashes, etc.
When searching for a part, if the number has a dash it will not show any results if you do not type the dash.
5 votes -
Task View
When I scroll down to look for a particular task and find and open the task, I found the task list jumps back to top of the list and then I have to scroll through the list again to find what I was looking for. I suppose if I noted the task number it would not be that big of an issue, but it would be handy if the list just stayed in the position that I stopped. Really a pain when you have multiple Work Orders.
5 votesunder review ·
AdminMichelle Oldfield
(Business Analyst, Advanced Technology Services, Inc.)
responded
Thank you for your feedback! We are looking into the technical requirements for making this happen.
-
Mass Cancel tasks in Ready Backlog
Allow sites to mass cancel open tasks from the Period capacity screen that are no longer needed or past PM dates.
5 votes -
Change Priority in Period Capacity to Scheduler
Allow sites to change priority on a task from the period capacity screen in the scheduling portal. This would allow us to be able to move it to the current week without having to go back and forth between the P/S role and the Tech role.
5 votes -
PM status change option in planner portal
Can the supervisors or planners have the ability to cancel work orders in the planner portal, either in the daily capacity or period capacity views?
Also, an alternative to "Cancel" missed PM's, since they were not technically cancelled. I don't mind the extra time it takes since it shouldn't be easy. But a better option that more accurately reflects the situation:
Missed-Customer - Due to customer constraints
Missed-Maintenance - Example, equipment not found, low staff, etc
Skipped - Example, in shop for repairs, awaiting parts, etc.To show in the drop down window with Cancel, Cancel-Duplicate, etc.
Just more robust…5 votes -
Color Change for rescheduled tasks
Different color (Orange) for items being rescheduled – When assigning tasks from previous week into daily capacity a visual identifier would help
5 votes -
MIN/MAX
I would be helpful to have access to the parts that still have a min/max that hasn't been set. If Supply Chain could get our hands on a list of parts that don't have a min/max set we could get ahead on submitting SARS instead of waiting for Stock Count or Work Orders to come in. When we enter Stock Counts at the end of the month when we are already busy, if we could enter SARS for items that don't have a min/max when we have down time, we could chip through them then.
5 votes -
Inverse filtering.
In addition to having filters such as "starts with," "equals," and "contains." Can we have the inverse, such as "does not start with," "does not equal," and "does not contain."
5 votes -
Additional internal comments after PO posting
We need to have the ability to add notes to the PO req in the internal comments section after it has been released to the buyer. In the supply chain role, there are often updates that need to be made or specific comments that need to be added to the PO req during the course of the parts/service order.
5 votes -
Closed Work Order
A closed Work Order can still be used as reference for the WO field requirement of a GNS requisition - the system shouldn't allow this and when an SCS will try to do it, there should be an error message saying something like "Reference WO is already closed; choose an open WO number."
5 votes -
Need the ability to create an escalation/event monitor per equipment/asset
A need has been identified to create Escalations/ Event Monitor for either an individual or a collection of equipment/assets.
If given this level of control in the escalation process we would be able to escalate particular down time occurrences to the proper people without "spamming" a host of individuals.
5 votes -
When Part ID is added/extended to a site in eFP Client, the system should create a Stock Escalation if a Min/Max >0 is entered.
When a Part ID is added/extended to a site in the eFP Client, the system should create a Stock Escalation if a Min/Max >0 is entered. It normally does this when a Part ID already exists at a site but it does not generate a Stock Escalation when a Part ID is initially added to a site Stock Record. We need to initiate this to comply with SAR (Stock Auth. Req.) process.
5 votes -
closing tasks
There are too many steps to close a work order that does not belong to ATS and does not impact our metrics. i have tp close approximately 150 work orders from other non-ats department's.
5 votes -
SCS should not have the ability to perform a manual cost change for parts in the eFP Client
SCS should not have the ability to perform a manual cost change for parts in the eFP Client.
5 votes -
RCA Trigger App on Power BI
All sites should have an RCA trigger Document filled out by this point. Being able to create a report or app on power bi to quickly see if any RCA's have been triggered in the current month is a great time saving tool. Can we have a template created that sites can then use that addresses safety, Failure count, Downtime, Cost, etc. in accordance with the RCA Trigger Template from the Standards and Assessments page?
a mock up has been created at this link:
https://app.powerbi.com/groups/me/reports/40e32eec-836a-4f7c-baa9-32f0dc704dc4?ctid=786b8a42-d6d2-45f9-ac36-b35652395f2a5 votesunder review ·AdminMichelle Oldfield
(Business Analyst, Advanced Technology Services, Inc.)
responded
Thank you for your feedback! Our Power BI analyst team is looking at your suggestion and determining how we could implement this.
-
Create a report in Power BI for Mexico´s Labor
The idea is to create a report in Power BI where the sites can review the Technician´s Labor. This idea was created via e-mail last 4/4/2018. Michael Vincent created the reported and he added it into the Application section in Power BI but unfortunately the report is not working as we expected. We saw some opportunities, for example, when you select the report by month for an specific site, we can not see all the technician´s labor. Please contact to me if you have any question or doubt.
5 votesunder review ·AdminMichelle Oldfield
(Business Analyst, Advanced Technology Services, Inc.)
responded
This suggestion has been shared with our Power BI Data Analyst to see what he is able to update on the existing report.
-
Sort names by alphabet in field to assign people
Sort names by alphabet in field to assign
5 votes
- Don't see your idea?
